|
Die gap geometry and wall boundary condition effects on the formation of extrusion surface instabilities for polyethylene melts |
|
R.P.G. Rutgers1,
MR. Mackley2, L.E. Rodd1, A. Bernnat3 |
|
1 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of
Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Qld, Australia 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, University of
Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3RA, UK 3Institut fur Kunststofftechnologie, Boeblingerstrasse 70,
D-70199 Stuttgart, Germany |
ABSTRACTWe study the onset and development of surface instabilities in a planar contraction die. The experimentally observed amplitude of the surface instability is dependent on die gap, exit geometry and wall boundary condition. Confirming LLDPE birefringence data, it is shown through numerical simulations that the extensional stresses in planar contraction flow is highest at the surface at the exit of the die. Comparison of the simulations with Rheotens data demonstrates that the stress in the material close to the surface reaches levels characteristic for extensional melt rupture. Numerical simulations show that the magnitude of the exit stress peak follows the same die geometry dependence as the instability. KEYWORDS: sharkskin, melt fracture, rheotens, lldpe, ldpe, k-bkz, pom-pom, simulation INTRODUCTIONDuring the extrusion of linear polyethylenes, surface instability may occur due to critical extensional stress levels at the exit of the die [1] [2] [3]. The extensional stress results from the modification of the flow field at the boundary condition transition. Alternative mechanisms have been proposed involving amongst others instability of the boundary condition at the wall near the exit (see e.g. [3] [4]) or constutive instabilities (see e.g. [5]). This paper aims to further investigate the role of a local rupturing mechanism, but does not intend to eliminate the possibility of aggravating effects of unstable boundary-conditions [3] which were not experimentally observed in this work, nor the presence of a critical extensional deformation rate [1]. In order to investigate the flow close to the wall near the exit of the die, experimental birefringence data may be complemented with numerical simulations. The K-BKZ constitutive equation with a Wagner damping function has been shown to predict global planar contraction flow fields quite accurately for LLDPE [6]. This model does not accurately predict the stress fields for low density polyethylene (LDPE), which typically shows no surface instabilities except at very low temperatures [6]. Early results with the molecular “pom-pom” model indicate that the break points in extensional LDPE data might be an inherent constitutive property [7]. For LDPE therefore, we attempt to predict the absence and onset of surface instabilities the pom-pom model developed by [9]. experimentalThe materials studied are BP Amoco LLDPE grades (LL05 and LL09) and an LDPE (LD10). The simple shear behaviour was characterised using an RDSII parallel plate rheometer. The materials were processed using a 25 mm Betol single screw extruder, fitted with a melt pump and an abrupt contraction slit die with quartz windows for flow visualisation. Flow birefringence was used as described elsewhere [6] to validate the global numerical prediction of the LLDPE flow and to study the global flow fields under conditions where surface instabilities occur. The extrudate surface distortion was characterised qualitatively using a Leica SEM 430 scanning electron microscope and its development was studied quantitatively with a Taylor Hobson Pneumo Form-Talysurf 120-L surface profile measurement technique with a standard diamond cone stylus 112/1836. Rheotens measurements were carried out according to a modified version of the methodology described in [8]. In order to allow a more in-depth analysis of local flow fields underlying the onset of instabilities than would have been possible within the constraints of experimental resolution, the flow field was numerically simulated using Polyflow software. The LLDPE was modelled for this purpose with an multi-mode Wagner model as previously described [6]. Preliminary one-dimensional simulations of the LDPE using a differential Pom-Pom model developed by [9] were carried out for streamlines close to the wall. The model parameters were obtained from simple shear and rheotens measurements using methods described by [10] and [8]. |
|
||
Comparison with Rheotens critical extensional stressesComparison of the simulations with Rheotens experimental data demonstrates that the stress in the material close to the surface may reach levels characteristic for melt rupture in extension:Fig. 4 shows experimental Rheotens rupture stresses (open symbols) and predicted extensional stress levels at the exit near the surface for LL09 (closed symbols). The curves linking the simulated stress levels are solid in regions where no instabilities were observed, and dotted when surface instability was present. The shaded zone indicates the onset of surface instability and appears to correlate with the critical Rheotens melt rupture stress.
Fig. 4: Rheotens rupture stress and predicted extensional stress peak at the die exit near the extrudate surface for LL09 at 180oC. Dotted lines and shaded area indicate conditions where surface instabilities were observed.
|
|
|
Fig 7: Apparent elongational viscosity of LD10 for different die exit velocities at T=190oC.
Fig. 8: Normalised viscosity as a function of strain rate of a single mode pom-pom polymer for q=2, 5 and 8. A centreline comparison of the multimode pom-pom model with planar contraction flow birefringence data is presented. A rough estimate of the extensional stresss levels near the die exit is obtained from a preliminary one-dimensional prediction of the pom-pom model response to a simulated deformation rate profile along the streamline at 50 mm from the wall It is suggested that full pom-pom model simulation of the flow field will be useful to to confirm that extensional stress levels at the exit are insufficiently high in LDPE to cause extrusion surface instabilities, exept at very low temperatures where critical levels may be reached. conclusions
For the LLDPE grades studied here, it
is found that extensional stress levels at the surface of the extrudate near
the die exit reach critical levels that are comparable to independently
determined melt failure stresses in Rheotens experiments. A surface instability
map is presented which relates predicted extensional stress levels downstream
of the die exit to Rheotens melt rupture stresses and to the onset of
extrusion surface instability. The observed qualitative and some quantitative
aspects of the instability may be explained in terms of a local crack
formation, which depends on geometry and conditions. Cracks of greater
magnitude would be formed under conditions where the critical stress level
reaches greater distances from the surface, and vise versa. This model could
be used to predict the onset and development of the instability on the basis
of the rheological parameters and the characteristic melt rupture stress of
the material. Preliminary simulation results are presented of a pom-pom model
in comparison to experimental LDPE contraction flow. These early results
indicate that the pom-pom model may be useful to explain the absence of
extrusion surface instabilities for LDPE. acknowledgements
Rutgers
and Bernnat thank BP-Amoco and the EPSRC for funding significant parts of
this work. S.N. Bhattacharya (RMIT) is thanked for providing some of the
Rheotens data. Taylor Hobson Pneumo is thanked for the use of their surface
profile measurement equipment. references1.
Cogswell F.N., J. Non-Newton. Fl. Mech. 2 (1977) 37-47. 2.
El Kissi
N., Piau J.-M., Toussaint F., J. Non-Newton. Fl.
Mech. 68 (2/3) (1997) 271-290. 3.
Kurtz S.J., SPE Antec ’95 (1995). 4.
Wang S.-Q., Drda P.A., Rheol. Acta
36 (2) (1997) 128-134. 5.
Koopmans R.J, Molenaar J., SPE
Antec, Indianapolis, May 6-9 (1996). 6.
Mackley M.R., Rutgers R.P.G., Gilbert D.G., J.
Non-Newton. Fl. Mech., 76 (1998) 281-297. 7.
McLeish T.C.B., Conference
Proceedings, PPS 15, s’Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands, May 31-June 4 1999. 8.
Wagner M.H., Bernnat A., Schultze
V., J. Rheol. 42 (4) 917-928 9. McLeish T.C.B., Larson R.G., J. Rheol. 42 (1) (1998) 81-110. Inkson N.J., McLeish T.C.B., Harlen O.G., J. Rheol, 43 (4) (1999) 873-896.
|